Premier test du TRI-PLIANT à 3000€ de Samsung !

Premier test du TRI-PLIANT à 3000€ de Samsung !

First test of the TRI-PLIANT at 3000€ from Samsung!

by Frandroid · View the channel on PSI

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Computing & Cybersecurity UDDigital Lifestyle and online world: consumer and user guidesUDTMobile phones and smartphones: consumer
🎙 Frandroid 👥 625K 📅 December 19, 2025 ⏱ 13 min 👁 39K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-20
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

tri-foldSamsungGalaxy Z TriFoldfoldable phonehands-on

Summary

This video is a hands-on review of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the first tri-fold smartphone from the company. The presenter, Omar, discusses the device’s ultra-thin profile when unfolded (3.9mm) and its brick-like thickness when folded, weighing 309g. He compares the design philosophy with Huawei’s Mate XT, noting that Samsung uses two separate screens (external and internal) while Huawei uses a single folding display. The video highlights the robust hinge mechanism, the subtle crease, and the lack of an intermediate unfolded state. Software features like multi-window with three apps, drag-and-drop, and Samsung DeX are demonstrated. The reviewer appreciates the large screen for media consumption and productivity but questions the practical use and high price (around €2500 in South Korea, projected higher in Europe). The video is part of a first-look review, not a full test, and the presenter admits uncertainty about the device’s long-term viability.

145 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a valuable first-hand assessment of a new product format, offering detailed observations on design, build quality, and user experience. The argumentation is solid, grounded in direct manipulation of the device and clear comparisons with the main competitor. The reviewer balances praise with critical reservations about weight, practicality, and price. The reasoning is transparent, acknowledging subjective impressions and open questions, which strengthens the credibility of the conclusions.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video relies on direct experience with the product, which is appropriate for a hands-on review. It does not cite academic or external sources, but includes a link to a corresponding article on Frandroid, which adds written documentation. The description also features a guide to other foldables. The title accurately advertises a first test, although the stated price of €3000 is slightly inflated compared to the ~€2500 mentioned in the video; this minor discrepancy does not undermine the overall content. The video is clearly non-sponsored, as stated in the description.

174 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the hands-on nature of the video, though the price mentioned (€3000) is slightly higher than the ~€2500 discussed in the content. The core topic matches perfectly.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The review is from a well-established tech outlet, explicitly non-sponsored, and based on direct hands-on experience. The presenter provides balanced opinions and acknowledges uncertainties, enhancing trustworthiness.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers an early and unfiltered look at Samsung’s first tri-fold device, clarifying the distinct design approach compared to Huawei. It contributes to the public understanding of the trade-offs between multi-screen and single-folding-screen formats, and highlights the practical implications for durability and daily use. The reviewer’s honest skepticism about the utility helps temper market hype.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Foldable smartphone — Background on the technology and evolution of folding devices.
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold — Samsung’s existing foldable series, providing context for the TriFold’s features.
  • Huawei Mate XT — The direct competitor mentioned in the video, illustrating an alternative design philosophy.
  • Samsung DeX — The desktop experience mode showcased in the video, relevant for productivity assessments.

119 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a solidly balanced review: high scores for information quantity and quality, a moderate technical depth suitable for general audiences, and a strong overall reliability due to the reputable outlet and non-sponsored status.

Reliability 8/10

💬 Among the 30 comments analyzed, the overall tone is positive, with many viewers praising the larger screen and the perceived robustness compared to Huawei, while some express concerns about the price and long-term durability.