Password Cracking With John The Ripper - RAR/ZIP & Linux Passwords

Password Cracking With John The Ripper - RAR/ZIP & Linux Passwords

🎙 HackerSploit 👥 1.0M 📅 February 18, 2018 ⏱ 12 min 👁 1.1M 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

John the Ripperzip2johnrar2johnshadow filepassword hash

Summary

In this tutorial, HackerSploit demonstrates how to crack encrypted ZIP, RAR, and Linux passwords using John the Ripper, a powerful password cracking utility. The video begins by explaining the purpose of John the Ripper and its capabilities for cracking password hashes. The presenter then shows how to extract the hash from a ZIP file using the zip2john tool, save it to a text file, and run John the Ripper with the appropriate format option to crack it. He successfully cracks a simple password (123456) and verifies it by extracting the file. Next, he explains how to crack Linux passwords by accessing the /etc/shadow file, creating a test user, and using John the Ripper directly on the shadow file. He also clarifies the output, noting that previously cracked hashes are not repeated. The video emphasizes that password cracking is time-dependent, and even simple passwords can be cracked quickly. It concludes with a brief reminder of the importance of patience and proper methodology in penetration testing.

164 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video offers practical, hands-on demonstrations of password cracking techniques, making it valuable for beginners in cybersecurity. The argumentation is straightforward: it explains the process step-by-step, from extracting password hashes to running the cracking tool, and emphasizes the role of password complexity and time. However, it lacks a discussion of countermeasures, such as using strong passwords or multi-factor authentication, and does not address the ethical and legal implications of password cracking. The demonstration is convincing for basic scenarios but does not cover advanced cracking strategies or defense mechanisms.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The tutorial is scientifically accurate in its use of John the Ripper and the associated utilities. However, no external sources are cited within the video; the description provides links to the creator’s website, app, and social media, but these are not directly referenced in the content. The title accurately describes the content, and the video stays on-topic throughout. The presentation is clear, though it could benefit from more rigorous coverage of security best practices and the limitations of crackable passwords.

183 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers cracking ZIP/RAR and Linux passwords using John the Ripper.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video provides a clear, step-by-step demonstration of password cracking using John the Ripper, a well-known security tool. The methodology is accurate but basic, and the presenter does not delve into deeper security implications or countermeasures. The information is reliable for educational purposes but lacks nuance regarding legal and ethical considerations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • HackerSploit Website — The official website of the channel, mentioned in the video description.
  • HackerSploit Android App — The channel's Android app, promoted in the description.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

This video provides a clear, beginner-friendly introduction to password cracking with John the Ripper, covering both ZIP/RAR archives and Linux shadow file cracking. The original value lies in its step-by-step approach and practical verification, which helps newcomers understand the entire process. However, it does not introduce new techniques beyond basic usage, and the content is fairly standard for penetration testing tutorials.

Pour aller plus loin :

124 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with slightly higher reliability and information quality, reflecting a solid introductory tutorial without deep technical depth. The technique score is moderate, indicating a practical but basic level, while quantity of information is average.

Reliability 7/10