Séance {L} « Interfaces, écritures et design éditorial »

Séance {L} « Interfaces, écritures et design éditorial »

Session {L} "Interfaces, Writing and Editorial Design"

by Chaire de recherche sur les écritures numériques · View the channel on PSI

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Computing & Cybersecurity UXApplied computingUXADigital Humanities
🎙 Chaire de recherche sur les écritures numériques 👥 318 📅 May 1, 2018 ⏱ 79 min 👁 116 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

digital writingeditorial designinteractive bookschildren's publishingdigital humanities

Summary

This video is a session from a research seminar on digital writing and editorial design. It features three presentations. The first, by Christine Develotte and Mabrouka El Hachani, analyzes the interplay between paper and tablet in children’s fiction books, examining text-image relations, narrative structure, and the articulation between the printed book and its accompanying application. They present two case studies and discuss how the materiality of the media shapes reading experiences. The second presentation, by Florence Rio, Bertrand Meslier, and Eric Kergosien, introduces a ‘Rédaction Kit’ for interactive digital books, focusing on how this tool reconfigures the act of writing for authors. They discuss the tool’s features, the challenges authors face with its interface, and the material and cognitive strategies authors develop to cope with the new writing environment. The third presentation, by Nathalie Lacelle, Marie-Christine Beaudry, and Prune Lieutier, describes a project supporting digital publishing for young readers in Quebec, emphasizing the collaborative model and the integration of digital media in publishing practices. The session concludes with a discussion on the implications of these findings for digital humanities and literacy studies.

182 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of this session lies in its rich, multi-perspective examination of digital writing and editorial design, grounded in concrete field studies and user observations. Each presentation provides original data and detailed analysis: the first offers a comparative framework for book/application hybrids; the second contributes to understanding the material constraints of digital writing tools; the third reflects on a large-scale support program. The argumentation is generally solid, with presenters supporting their claims with examples, screenshots, and observational evidence. The discussions reveal a nuanced understanding of the interaction between technology and creative practice. However, the presentations are brief overviews rather than in-depth expositions, and some points could benefit from more critical engagement with broader literature.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high: the three teams are affiliated with recognized universities and research laboratories, and the projects appear methodologically sound (interviews, observations, analyses of digital artifacts). The sources used are not explicitly cited in the transcript, but the speakers reference their own published work and ongoing collaborations. The title accurately reflects the content, and the session stays on-topic throughout. As no comments were provided, no public reception data is available. The overall structure is coherent, with a clear progression from textual analysis to tool design to institutional support.

219 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: it covers interfaces, writing practices, and editorial design in digital publishing, as presented in the three talks.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is an academic seminar from a research chair, featuring presentations by established researchers. Content is credible but the transcript is auto-generated and contains errors, making precise verification difficult. The presentations offer structured arguments and references to ongoing research projects.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Contribution & Novelties

The session provides an original contribution by bringing together three research projects that critically examine digital writing and editorial design from complementary angles: text–image relations, authorial workflows, and institutional support. The combination of microanalysis and broader socio-technical perspectives is valuable for digital humanities scholars.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Interactive fiction — Relevant to the discussion of non-linear writing and user choices.
  • Digital humanities — Provides theoretical framework for studying computational approaches to humanistic inquiry.
  • Multimodal literacy — Relevant to the analysis of books and apps combining text, image, and sound.

91 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows strong scores in quantity of information and global reliability, with lower but still solid quality and technical levels. This reflects a dense, expert talk with occasional limitations in depth and technical detail.

Reliability 7/10