La publication savante en contexte numérique - Séance 1

La publication savante en contexte numérique - Séance 1

Scholarly publishing in the digital context - Session 1

🎙 Renée Bourassa and Jean-Claude Guédon 👥 318 📅 May 12, 2017 ⏱ 99 min 👁 302 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

scholarly publishingopen accessbook materialitydigital humanitiesdigital edition

Summary

This video is the first session of a colloquium on scholarly publishing in the digital context, held at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). The session features two main talks: the first by Renée Bourassa (Université Laval) examines the changing materiality of the book in the digital age, drawing on media archaeology and design theories to explore how the codex form evolves into hybrid, interactive, and multimodal devices. She discusses concepts such as remediation, affordances, and the intermediality of literary works, highlighting experimental projects that combine digital text, data visualization, and participatory culture. The second talk by Jean-Claude Guédon (Université de Montréal) focuses on open access in Quebec, criticizing the commercialization of scholarly communication and the dominance of English, while advocating for a more equitable, multilingual, and community-driven publishing ecosystem. Guédon emphasizes the concept of territory and the need to democratize knowledge production. The discussions offer both theoretical insights and practical examples, making this a valuable resource for scholars interested in digital humanities, publishing studies, and open science.

169 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high, as it brings together two complementary perspectives from leading researchers in their fields. Renée Bourassa provides a deep theoretical framework rooted in media archeology and design, supported by concrete examples of digital literary experiments (e.g., interactive books, data visualization, hypermedia). Her argumentation is systematic and traces the historical evolution of the book from the codex to networked objects, effectively demonstrating the continuity and rupture in material practices. Jean-Claude Guédon offers a sharp critique of the current scholarly publishing system, exposing the economic and linguistic biases that marginalize non-English speaking communities. His argument is built on a historical analysis of scientific communication, linking the origins of journals to the present commercial oligopoly, and he proposes open access as a means to reclaim the universality of knowledge. Both speakers anchor their claims in well-known scholarly works (e.g., Marshall McLuhan, Jay David Bolter, Richard Grusin) and provide logical, well-reasoned arguments, though the video lacks formal citations and the transcript is occasionally garbled.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is generally high: the speakers are established academics, the arguments are coherent and reference canonical works in media studies and science communication. However, the presentation is a colloquium talk rather than a peer-reviewed article, so sources are not systematically cited, and the transcript is impaired by auto-generation errors, which slightly diminishes the overall quality. The description provides no external links, limiting verifiability. The title precisely matches the content, as it is indeed a session on scholarly publishing in the digital context, with a clear focus on the materiality of the book and open access in Quebec. The title does not overpromise; it accurately frames the topic. The video’s low production values (static camera, occasional audio issues) do not affect the intellectual content but may affect viewer engagement.

311 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately describes the content: a session on scholarly publishing in the digital context, with two complementary talks.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk is given by recognized academics at a university colloquium, with well-structured arguments and references to scholarly works. However, the transcript is an imperfect auto-generated text, and the video quality is low with limited production values.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The video contributes to the field of digital humanities and media studies by offering a dual perspective: one on the evolving form of the book (Bourassa) and one on the political economy of scholarly communication (Guédon). Bourassa’s emphasis on design and materiality enriches the discourse on digital literature, while Guédon’s critique of the hegemonic English-language publishing system provides a compelling argument for the need to pluralize knowledge. The combination of these perspectives in a single session highlights the synergy between theoretical reflections and practical concerns, which is an original approach in academic conferences.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Média archéologie — Perspective clé sur l’étude des médias comme couches historiques, pertinente pour la discussion de la matérialité du livre.
  • Open access — Lien vers les principes d’ouverture des publications, au cœur de l’argumentation de Guédon.
  • Digital humanities — Domaine général qui englobe les problématiques soulevées dans cette session.
  • Codex — Historique de la forme du livre qui sert de base à l’analyse de Bourassa.

164 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows strong scores in information quality and global reliability, with slightly lower scores in quantity of information and technical level. This reflects the fact that the content is dense and well-argued but relies on a single conference session, and the technical level is accessible albeit not overly advanced. The overall balance suggests a high-quality intellectual resource for those interested in scholarly publishing and digital humanities.

Reliability 8/10