
Conférence Laura Mandell : BigDIVA: Nourishing and Sustaining a Scholarly Infrastructure
Keywords
Summary
171 words
Critical Evaluation
Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument
The talk provides valuable insights into the practical operation of a digital humanities infrastructure. The speaker offers concrete examples of how ARC and BigDIVA serve scholars, such as faceted searching, visual exploration, and the promotion of open educational resources. She argues convincingly for the importance of peer review for digital projects, illustrating with her own experience and the success of NINES. The argumentation is solid, built on years of hands-on experience and a clear vision for sustainable scholarly infrastructure. She also addresses potential criticisms, such as the controversy with Early Modern Print, and explains the benefits of improved OCR access.
Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy
The presenter refers to specific projects, such as NINES, 18th Connect, MESA, and the Text Creation Partnership, but does not provide formal citations or URLs. The talk is based on her role as director of ARC and reflects a personal, experiential viewpoint. The title accurately captures the focus on BigDIVA and its sustaining infrastructure. There is no explicit reference to published articles, except for a mention of Susan Brown’s work on ’tensions and pressures in digital scholarship,’ but it is not formally cited. The information is likely reliable given the speaker’s authority, but the lack of verifiable sources limits its scientific rigor.
217 words
Title / Content Match
The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the BigDIVA visualization tool and the broader ARC infrastructure, discussing its design, sustainability, and value for digital scholarship.
Quality & Reliability
8/10
The speaker is a recognized scholar in digital humanities, and the talk provides a detailed, well-structured account of a real scholarly infrastructure project. The information is based on direct experience and includes concrete examples, but relies primarily on anecdotal evidence and the speaker's own perspective rather than formal evaluation or peer-reviewed analysis.
Key Moments
Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.
- Introduction by the host and presentation of Laura Mandell's background.
- Explanation of ARC (Advanced Research Consortium) and its constituent scholarly communities.
- Description of the ARC infrastructure: Solr server, Collex interface, and metadata standards.
- Demonstration of BigDIVA visual interface, including genre, discipline, and format views.
- Discussion of peer review process for digital projects and the role of TypeRight for OCR correction.
- Addressing infrastructure tensions: credit, stability, and simplicity, and how ARC mediates them.
- Conclusion and final remarks on the sustainability of scholarly infrastructure.
Cited Sources
- BigDIVA website — The web-based search and discovery service described in the talk.
- NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship) — One of the scholarly communities under ARC, peer-reviewing digital projects.
- 18th Connect — A scholarly community for 18th-century studies, part of ARC.
- TypeRight — A tool developed for correcting OCR in ECCO/EEBO documents.
Contribution & Novelties
The talk provides an insider’s view of a large-scale digital humanities infrastructure, highlighting the practical challenges of sustainability, peer review, and cross-institutional collaboration. It emphasizes the importance of community curation and the integration of open-access and proprietary resources, offering a model for similar projects.
Pour aller plus loin :
- Digital Humanities (Wikipedia) — Overview of the field and its methods.
- Metadata (Wikipedia) — Foundational concept for describing digital resources.
- Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) — Standard for encoding digital texts, central to TypeRight’s output.
- Optical Character Recognition (Wikipedia) — Background on OCR and its limitations, relevant to TypeRight.
- Open Access (Wikipedia) — The movement that ARC supports by integrating open scholarly resources.
111 words
Radar Profile
The radar chart suggests a well-balanced profile, with high scores in quality and quantity of information, moderate technical depth reflecting its expert-level content, and slightly lower but still solid reliability due to the reliance on experiential knowledge.