Conférence Laura Mandell : BigDIVA: Nourishing and Sustaining a Scholarly Infrastructure

Conférence Laura Mandell : BigDIVA: Nourishing and Sustaining a Scholarly Infrastructure

🎙 Laura Mandell 👥 318 📅 February 28, 2019 ⏱ 35 min 👁 36 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

BigDIVAARCdigital humanitiesmetadatapeer reviewOCR correctionTypeRightscholarly communication

Summary

In this conference talk, Laura Mandell presents BigDIVA (Big Data Infrastructure Visualization Application), a web-based discovery tool for humanities scholars. She explains that BigDIVA is fed by the ARC Catalog, which aggregates metadata from various scholarly communities such as NINES, 18th Connect, and MESA. These communities curate open-access and proprietary resources, and ARC indexes them in a Solr server. The talk details the infrastructure, including the use of RDF metadata and the addition of peer-reviewed digital projects. Mandell demonstrates BigDIVA’s visual interface, which allows users to explore resources by genre, discipline, and format, with circles sized by resource count. She also describes TypeRight, a tool for correcting OCR in ECCO and EEBO documents, enabling scholars to create corrected texts. The presentation addresses tensions in scholarly infrastructure: credit, stability, and simplicity. She explains how peer review through ARC provides credit for digital work, and how TypeRight offers a way for scholars to contribute. Overall, the talk emphasizes the importance of building sustainable, community-driven digital humanities infrastructures that bridge proprietary and open-access resources.

171 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into the practical operation of a digital humanities infrastructure. The speaker offers concrete examples of how ARC and BigDIVA serve scholars, such as faceted searching, visual exploration, and the promotion of open educational resources. She argues convincingly for the importance of peer review for digital projects, illustrating with her own experience and the success of NINES. The argumentation is solid, built on years of hands-on experience and a clear vision for sustainable scholarly infrastructure. She also addresses potential criticisms, such as the controversy with Early Modern Print, and explains the benefits of improved OCR access.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presenter refers to specific projects, such as NINES, 18th Connect, MESA, and the Text Creation Partnership, but does not provide formal citations or URLs. The talk is based on her role as director of ARC and reflects a personal, experiential viewpoint. The title accurately captures the focus on BigDIVA and its sustaining infrastructure. There is no explicit reference to published articles, except for a mention of Susan Brown’s work on ’tensions and pressures in digital scholarship,’ but it is not formally cited. The information is likely reliable given the speaker’s authority, but the lack of verifiable sources limits its scientific rigor.

217 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the BigDIVA visualization tool and the broader ARC infrastructure, discussing its design, sustainability, and value for digital scholarship.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a recognized scholar in digital humanities, and the talk provides a detailed, well-structured account of a real scholarly infrastructure project. The information is based on direct experience and includes concrete examples, but relies primarily on anecdotal evidence and the speaker's own perspective rather than formal evaluation or peer-reviewed analysis.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • BigDIVA website — The web-based search and discovery service described in the talk.
  • NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship) — One of the scholarly communities under ARC, peer-reviewing digital projects.
  • 18th Connect — A scholarly community for 18th-century studies, part of ARC.
  • TypeRight — A tool developed for correcting OCR in ECCO/EEBO documents.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides an insider’s view of a large-scale digital humanities infrastructure, highlighting the practical challenges of sustainability, peer review, and cross-institutional collaboration. It emphasizes the importance of community curation and the integration of open-access and proprietary resources, offering a model for similar projects.

Pour aller plus loin :

111 words

Radar Profile

The radar chart suggests a well-balanced profile, with high scores in quality and quantity of information, moderate technical depth reflecting its expert-level content, and slightly lower but still solid reliability due to the reliance on experiential knowledge.

Reliability 7/10