#Edito17 - séance 5 : L'archive éditorialisée : de la ressource originale à l'appropriation

#Edito17 - séance 5 : L'archive éditorialisée : de la ressource originale à l'appropriation

#Edito17 - session 5: The editorialized archive: from the original resource to appropriation

🎙 Antoine Courtin, Jeffrey Schnapp 👥 318 📅 April 6, 2017 ⏱ 121 min 👁 177 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

archiveeditorialisationdigitisationknowledge designcrowdsourcing

Summary

This seminar session, part of the “Écritures numériques” series, focuses on the editorialisation of archives—the process by which digitised heritage resources are structured, enriched, and made accessible through digital devices. Antoine Courtin, an engineer at the INHA, opens with a practitioner’s overview of how archives institutions are transforming their collections into online platforms. He distinguishes between digitised archives and the metadata (‘instruments de recherche’) that organise them, illustrating the challenges of adapting archival tree structures to web navigation. He presents several case studies, including the use of IIIF and Mirador for interoperable image viewers, and highlights the rise of crowdsourcing projects like transcription initiatives and the ‘Un Jour en Poilu’ project, which involve the public in augmenting archival content. He also discusses the role of social media and blogs in providing alternative access to archival material. The second speaker, Jeffrey Schnapp, introduces the concept of ‘knowledge design’ as a framework for thinking about how archives can be reimagined as dynamic, user-driven spaces. The talk emphasises that editorialisation is not merely a technical process but a cultural and cognitive one, where the boundary between institution and public becomes more permeable. The session concludes with a discussion on the implications for archival practice and research.

203 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of this presentation lies in its concrete illustration of how archives are being reimagined in the digital age. Courtin’s examples—from modular theatre models to historical city atlases—demonstrate that editorialisation has historical precedents, while his account of contemporary projects shows a spectrum of user involvement, from simple indexing to collaborative co-creation. The argument is structured evolutionarily: first outlining institutional digitisation efforts, then moving to external initiatives that repurpose archival material. Schnapp’s contribution adds a theoretical layer, arguing that knowledge design is essential to make archives meaningful and navigable. The argumentation is generally clear, though the talk is more descriptive than analytical, and some claims, such as the effectiveness of crowdsourcing, are supported with anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous data. The lack of a clear conceptual framework in Courtin’s early section sometimes leads to a list-like enumeration of examples, but the transition to Schnapp’s synthesis provides cohesion.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate. The speakers cite several real projects and platforms—FranceArchives, IIIF, Mirador, FamilySearch, Hypothèses.org—which are verifiable. However, they do not provide academic references for their theoretical claims, and some mentions (e.g., ‘Marianne Chabin’) lack context. The historical examples (Brecht’s Modelbuch, Braun & Hogenberg’s city views) are plausible but not precisely referenced. The title’s promise is fulfilled: the content indeed addresses the editorialisation of archives from original resource to appropriation. No sponsor segment interrupts the talk. Overall, the reliability of the information is adequate for a seminar, but for scholarly use, one should consult the cited projects directly.

262 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which addresses the editorialisation of archives from source to appropriation.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The seminar presents a well-informed discussion of digital archival practices, with concrete examples and theoretical insights from two experts. However, it lacks systematic citation of sources and is an oral presentation rather than a peer-reviewed publication, which limits its reliability for rigorous academic use.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • FranceArchives portal — Mentioned as a new national portal aggregating archival finding aids and digitised documents.
  • IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework) — Referenced as a standard for interoperable image delivery, enabling tools like Mirador.
  • Mirador viewer — Presented as a research workspace for comparing and annotating images from different archives.
  • Un Jour en Poilu — A citizen crowdsourcing project indexing the war records on Mémoire des Hommes.
  • Mémoire des Hommes — Used as the institutional database for military records in the Un Jour en Poilu project.
  • Hypothèses.org — Cited as a platform for research blogs, used for editorialising archives in innovative ways.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The original contribution of this seminar is to bridge the gap between archival science and media studies by framing the digitisation of archives as a process of editorialisation. Courtin’s practitioner perspective highlights the shift from traditional archival description to user-driven enrichment, while Schnapp’s concept of knowledge design offers a theoretical lens for understanding how archives can become engines of knowledge creation rather than mere repositories. The discussion of crowdsourcing, IIIF, and mobile access points to emerging trends in the field. The presentation encourages a rethinking of institutional roles and public engagement.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF) — Essential for interoperable digital image delivery, directly relevant to the archival workflows discussed.
  • Project Mirador — An open-source widget for deep zoom and annotation, central to the research workspace concept.
  • FranceArchives — The national aggregator that illustrates the institutional approach to archival digitisation.
  • Un site sur l’éditorialisation (French) — A resource that contextualises the notion of editorialisation in digital environments.
  • Wikipedia: Crowdsourcing — Provides background on the participatory model used in archival transcription projects.

176 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a well-rounded presentation with high scores in information quantity and technical level, reflecting the seminar's rich content. The slightly lower reliability score is consistent with the absence of rigorous citation, typical of an oral presentation. The overall balance indicates a valuable but not formally peer-reviewed resource.

Reliability 7/10