Getting Started in OT/ICS Cybersecurity 2026 (Part 9B): OT Cyber Attack Response

Getting Started in OT/ICS Cybersecurity 2026 (Part 9B): OT Cyber Attack Response

🎙 Mike Holcomb 👥 28K 📅 October 8, 2026 ⏱ 155 min 👁 95 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-10-08
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

OT cybersecurityIDSSIEMhoneypotincident response

Summary

This video is part 9B of a series on OT/ICS cybersecurity, focusing on network security monitoring and the later phases of the OT incident response lifecycle. It begins by explaining how firewall logs can serve as a basic form of network security monitoring, emphasizing the need to enable logging and use AI to review events. The instructor then contrasts IDS and IPS, stressing that IPS is never used in OT due to the risk of blocking legitimate traffic and causing process failures. Host-based monitoring, including EDR and allow/block listing, is discussed as an evolving area in OT. The video covers SIEM and centralized logging, highlighting detective controls, data correlation, and integration with threat intelligence and vulnerability management. It demonstrates deploying internal OT honeypots, specifically the Moth Modbus honeypot, and discusses threat hunting. The final sections detail IR phases 3 through 6: containment (including manual fallback operations), eradication, recovery, and lessons learned. Throughout, the instructor emphasizes safety and availability over pure cybersecurity, and the need for documented playbooks and runbooks.

169 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial practical value for OT security practitioners. It offers concrete guidance on implementing network security monitoring, from enabling firewall logging to deploying IDS sensors and SIEM. The argumentation is built on the fundamental difference between IT and OT: in OT, availability and safety trump security, so active blocking (IPS) is avoided. This is well-argued with clear examples of false positives causing plant downtime. The instructor uses real-world anecdotes, such as finding state adversaries through firewall logs and a data center theft, to illustrate the importance of detective controls. The discussion of EDR in OT acknowledges the shift from outright rejection to cautious adoption, weighing risks and benefits. The explanation of SIEM correlation and the value of integrating threat intel and vulnerability data is logically sound. The IR phases are presented with detailed reasoning, especially containment, where the instructor explains why simply unplugging systems is not an option and manual fallback operations are necessary. The emphasis on playbooks and runbooks being simple enough for anyone to follow is a strong practical point. Overall, the argumentation is coherent, experience-based, and tailored to the unique constraints of OT environments.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite academic studies or formal sources; it relies on the instructor’s professional experience and widely accepted industry practices. The technical content aligns with standards such as NIST SP 800-82 and SANS best practices, though these are not explicitly referenced. The title accurately reflects the content, which covers OT cyber attack response as promised. The description includes links to the instructor’s course and website, which are relevant resources but not external sources. The absence of citations is typical for a tutorial-style video, and the information presented is consistent with established OT security principles. The instructor’s claims about IPS risks, SIEM benefits, and IR phases are credible and not contradicted by mainstream knowledge. The video’s rigor is adequate for its educational purpose, though it lacks formal references.

333 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the video covers OT cyber attack response, including containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned, matching the promised scope.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The content is grounded in established OT/ICS security practice (passive IDS over IPS, SIEM centralization, honeypots, IR lifecycle phases) and the instructor draws on field experience. Claims are consistent with widely accepted frameworks (NIST, SANS). No primary research is cited, but the technical guidance is coherent and actionable.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Getting Started in OT/ICS Cybersecurity (OnDemand) — Link to the instructor's paid course on OT/ICS cybersecurity.
  • Mike Holcomb's website — Instructor's website with additional resources.
  • Mike Holcomb's resources — Alternative URL for free OT/ICS cybersecurity resources.

Contribution & Novelties

The video’s original contribution lies in its practical synthesis of network security monitoring and incident response specifically for OT environments, emphasizing the unique constraints of operational technology. It provides a step-by-step approach to implementing passive monitoring, from firewall log analysis to SIEM deployment, and includes a hands-on demo of the Moth Modbus honeypot. The discussion of EDR in OT reflects current shifts in the field, and the detailed walkthrough of IR phases 3-6 offers actionable guidance rarely covered in such depth in free content. The emphasis on manual fallback operations and the need for simple, executable playbooks adds practical value.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • NIST SP 800-82 Guide to Industrial Control Systems Security — Foundational framework for ICS security.
  • SANS ICS515: ICS Visibility, Detection, and Response — Course covering similar topics.
  • Moth honeypot project — Open-source Modbus honeypot mentioned in the video.
  • Volt Typhoon — Chinese state-sponsored threat actor referenced in the video.

154 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high information quantity and technical level, with strong reliability and quality. The video is dense with practical guidance, suitable for intermediate to advanced OT security professionals.

Reliability 8/10