ZELDA : UBISOFT préparait un JEU avec GANONDORF 😮 NINTENDO l'aurait annulé, explications !!!

ZELDA : UBISOFT préparait un JEU avec GANONDORF 😮 NINTENDO l'aurait annulé, explications !!!

ZELDA: UBISOFT was developing a GAME with GANONDORF 😮 NINTENDO allegedly canceled it, here's why!!!

🎙 Julien Chièze 👥 964K 📅 September 26, 2026 ⏱ 16 min 👁 58K 📄 news review 🧭 2026-10-03
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ZeldaUbisoftGanondorfcancelled gameInsider Gaming

Summary

This video, presented by gaming journalist Julien Chièze, discusses a recent exclusive report from Insider Gaming claiming that Ubisoft Milan and Nintendo were working on a new Zelda game, codenamed ‘Goliath’, which was ultimately canceled. The host begins by recalling the 2017 E3 moment when Shigeru Miyamoto praised Ubisoft’s Davide Soliani, establishing a strong partnership that led to the Mario + Rabbids series. According to the report, after the release of Mario + Rabbids: Sparks of Hope in late 2022, Ubisoft Milan focused on a new ambitious project: a Zelda spin-off where the player would control Ganondorf. However, despite a prototype delivered by November 2023, Nintendo rejected it, and the project was abandoned. The report also suggests that the cancellation contributed to Soliani’s departure to found a new studio. Chièze provides context on the collaboration, notes that Ubisoft may have influenced Nintendo’s open-world design, and gives his personal estimate of 80-90% that the prototype existed. The video also includes a second viewer question about whether Ubisoft is making a comeback, referencing the upcoming release of Rayman Legends HD and Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag remake, and comparing a GTA 6 collector’s edition to Ubisoft’s more affordable Rayman bundle. Finally, the host discusses the upcoming Ocarina of Time remake for Nintendo Switch 2 as a major holiday release.

217 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video’s primary value lies in bringing attention to an exclusive report and offering contextual analysis that is largely absent from raw news articles. Chièze explains the background of the Ubisoft-Nintendo relationship and the significance of the project, helping viewers understand why this rumor is plausible. He also explicitly cautions that the information is not confirmed and that Ubisoft declined to comment, demonstrating a responsible approach that distinguishes facts from speculation. The argumentation is moderately solid: while the host acknowledges the rumor’s uncertain basis, he builds a case based on the credibility of Insider Gaming’s past reporting and the logical sequence of events described. However, the reasoning relies heavily on the single report, and the host’s subjective probability estimate (80-90%) is not supported by concrete evidence. The secondary segment about Ubisoft’s comeback is anecdotal and based on personal impressions rather than robust analysis, but it serves to illustrate broader trends. Overall, the video offers valuable synthesis and commentary for a gaming audience, but its argumentative strength is limited by the lack of independent verification.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video’s scientific rigor is moderate. The primary source is a single article from Insider Gaming, which provides the headline information; no additional corroborating sources are cited in the video or description. The host attempts to add context, but does not provide verifiable primary documents or independent confirmations. The description includes affiliate links for hardware, but these are not relevant to the content. The title is highly sensational (using “😮” and multiple exclamation marks), which may overstate the certainty of the information, but the content itself is more measured. The discrepancy is minimal since the core claim of the video matches the title. No public comments were provided for analysis, so no community feedback is available to assess reception.

308 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the main topic: a rumored canceled Zelda game by Ubisoft. The sensational tone matches the content, though the video also covers other recent Ubisoft news.

Quality & Reliability

5/10

The content is based on a single unverified report from Insider Gaming, presented with appropriate caution. The host provides context and personal analysis but relies heavily on rumors, making the reliability moderate.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video adds value by contextualizing a rumored game development project within the larger history of Ubisoft-Nintendo relations, offering personal insights and a plausible narrative. It also touches on broader industry dynamics, such as game cancellations and studio dynamics. The host’s explicit caveat about the unverified nature of the report is a responsible practice.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • The Legend of Zelda — Provides an overview of the franchise, relevant for understanding the series’ history and importance.
  • Ganondorf — Detailed background on the character central to the rumored spin-off.
  • Ubisoft Milan — Information about the studio behind the project, including its past work on Mario + Rabbids.
  • Mario + Rabbids — Covers the successful collaboration between Ubisoft and Nintendo, setting the stage for the speculated Zelda project.
  • Insider Gaming — The website that broke the exclusive, for further context on their reporting.

143 words

Radar Profile

The score profile shows a moderate to high quantity and quality of information, with a slightly lower technical level suited to a broad audience. Reliability is the weakest dimension, reflecting the heavy reliance on a single unverified source. This suggests the video is informative and accessible but should be interpreted with caution regarding factual certainty.

Reliability 5/10