ICM 2026 Panel - CWM Panel: Finding and Defining Success in Mathematics

ICM 2026 Panel - CWM Panel: Finding and Defining Success in Mathematics

🎙 Simons Foundation 👥 60K 📅 September 9, 2026 ⏱ 77 min 👁 293 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-09-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

success definitioncareer pathwaysmathematical communitysocial impactexpository writing

Summary

The panel, moderated by Karolina Raujo and Darla Kramer, features four mathematicians with different career paths discussing how they define success. Analisa Krenel describes her journey from PDEs to dynamical systems and her focus on teaching and writing. Fern Hunt offers a historical critique of the reward system in mathematics, linking it to a ‘Faustian bargain’ and proposing a new award celebrating contributions to societal issues. Emily Riehl emphasizes expository writing and the advancement of human understanding, citing Thurston. Shelby Wilson defines success through impact on people and real-world applications in government research. The discussion challenges traditional metrics like papers and awards, advocating for a more inclusive and socially engaged definition of success. The panel also touches on failure, adaptability, and the potential influence of AI on future measurements of success.

131 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value lies in the diverse and experienced voices, offering practical insights into non-traditional career paths and the importance of impact beyond publications. The argumentation is grounded in personal experience and historical analysis, though lacks quantitative evidence. Each speaker presents a coherent narrative, with Fern Hunt providing a broader societal critique. The discussion is compelling but subjective, and does not offer rigorous data.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The title accurately reflects the content. The sources mentioned are credible (Thurston’s essay, Kehlmann’s novel, the Right Livelihood Award), though not extensively cited. The rigor is moderate; the panel is expert-based rather than evidence-based. The title is appropriate.

116 words

Title / Content Match

Titre accurately describes the panel's focus on defining success in mathematics.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Panel composed of distinguished mathematicians with diverse career paths; discussion is thoughtful and well-articulated, though based on personal experiences and not systematic evidence.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • On Proof and Progress in Mathematics — Emily Riehl cites this essay by William Thurston to argue that the goal of mathematics is advancing human understanding.
  • Measuring the World — Fern Hunt references this novel by Daniel Kehlmann about Gauss and Humboldt to discuss the historical context of mathematical research.
  • Right Livelihood Award — Fern Hunt proposes a new mathematics award modeled after the Right Livelihood Award to recognize contributions to societal problems.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The panel offers a diverse set of perspectives on what constitutes success in mathematics, challenging the traditional metrics of publications, grants, and prizes. It emphasizes the importance of social impact, teaching, expository writing, and personal fulfillment. Fern Hunt’s historical analysis and proposal for a new award highlight the need to broaden recognition in the mathematical community.

Pour aller plus loin :

129 words

Radar Profile

The scores show high quality and quantity of discussion, with moderate technical depth and high reliability given the expert panel. The profile suggests a thoughtful, accessible conversation valuable for broad audiences.

Reliability 7/10