Diane Bolet, Julia Cagé, Axelle Ferrière & Mirna Safi – Inaugural Lecture of the School of Research

Diane Bolet, Julia Cagé, Axelle Ferrière & Mirna Safi – Inaugural Lecture of the School of Research

🎙 Sciences Po 👥 68K 📅 September 11, 2026 ⏱ 111 min 👁 12 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-09-11
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ERCsocial sciencesvoting behaviourredistributiondiscrimination

Summary

The video captures the inaugural lecture of Sciences Po’s School of Research, a roundtable featuring four researchers who each received European Research Council (ERC) grants. The host introduces the format and the speakers: Diane Bolet (political science), Julia Cagé (economics), Axelle Ferrière (macroeconomics), and Mirna Safi (sociology). Each presents their ERC project: Bolet studies the social and political consequences of the green transition, particularly anti-climate attitudes and radical right support, using ethnographic fieldwork and surveys; Cagé investigates long-run voting behaviour from historical data, addressing the ecological inference problem with new methods and digitized archives; Ferrière rethinks the efficiency-redistribution trade-off in tax and transfer design, focusing on conditionality, wealth taxation, and VAT; Safi explores the bidirectional relationship between discrimination and inequality, attempting to quantify how unequal treatment contributes to unequal outcomes. The discussion also includes career advice for young researchers, emphasizing curiosity, taking intellectual risks, and using methods as tools. The event illustrates the value of research in tackling contested societal issues.

161 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value lies in the direct presentation of cutting-edge research agendas by leading scholars. Each speaker provides a clear rationale for their project, showing how their work addresses existing gaps and uses innovative methods. The argumentation is solid, grounded in empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks. For instance, Bolet justifies her multimethod approach, Cagé highlights the power of historical data, Ferrière connects fiscal policy to macroeconomic theory, and Safi links experimental and observational data. The speakers also reflect on the importance of research freedom and interdisciplinary collaboration, adding a philosophical dimension. The arguments are persuasive and well-structured, though the format limits depth; each talk is relatively brief and serves as an introduction rather than a full exposition.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The rigor is high: all speakers are recognized experts, and their projects have undergone rigorous peer review for ERC funding. They reference their own background and previous work, though specific citations are not given in the transcript. The description provides links to Sciences Po’s social media and app, but no direct academic sources. The title accurately reflects the content—a roundtable with the four named researchers. The absence of formal citations is typical for a lecture, but the speakers imply reliance on established literature. The title alignment is perfect, and the content is academically credible, although the audience is likely a university community rather than a general public.

238 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately lists the four speakers and the event, matching the video content without ambiguity.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The content is delivered by established researchers at Sciences Po, all recipients of prestigious ERC grants. The lecture presents their research agendas and methodological approaches, which are based on peer-reviewed work and rigorous empirical designs. No unsupported claims are made; the presentation relies on the speakers' expertise and funded projects.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture provides an insider view of four innovative research projects funded by ERC, showcasing the breadth of social science research on pressing issues like climate backlash, historical voting patterns, taxation, and discrimination. Each project introduces novel data collection methods, interdisciplinary approaches, or methodological advancements (e.g., solving ecological inference with industrial organization tools). The roundtable format highlights the collaborative and independent nature of academic research.

Pour aller plus loin :

120 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the authoritative source and expert speakers. Quantity of information is substantial, though the technical level is moderate due to the introductory nature. The overall balance indicates a solid, credible presentation with a strong factual basis.

Reliability 8/10