Comment créer un questionnaire Google Form avec ChatGPT et Claude

Comment créer un questionnaire Google Form avec ChatGPT et Claude

How to create a Google Form survey using ChatGPT and Claude

🎙 The French Bot 👥 4K 📅 September 17, 2026 ⏱ 13 min 👁 2 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-09-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Google FormApps ScriptChatGPTClaudeAutomation

Summary

The video demonstrates how to create a Google Form questionnaire from scratch using AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT, without manually typing each question. The creator, a professional AI trainer, shares his workflow for generating a full form via JavaScript code (Google Apps Script) that can be pasted into script.google.com to instantly create the form. He shows two examples: one with Claude generating a 47-question survey for an accounting firm and another with ChatGPT creating an 11-question survey. The emphasis is on asking the AI to generate the script rather than just the questions, saving significant time. The video covers steps such as providing context from meeting transcripts, using voice dictation tools, authorizing the script, and obtaining edit and share links. It also promotes his training services and offers a free 30-minute coaching call. The content is practical and based on personal experience, but includes promotional segments and lacks scientific citations.

151 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable practical advice for automating form creation, highlighting the efficiency of generating code rather than manually entering questions. The argument is well-supported by live demonstrations with both Claude and ChatGPT, showing real-world applications and time savings. The creator’s background as a trainer adds credibility, though the evidence is anecdotal and lacks comparative data. The reasoning is clear and logically structured, from problem identification to solution implementation, making the tutorial persuasive for its target audience.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not engage in rigorous scientific methodology but focuses on practical application. No external sources or references are cited, only links to the creator’s own site and scheduling tool. The title is appropriate as content matches the promised demonstration. However, the video contains promotional segments for the creator’s coaching services, which may reduce objectivity. Overall, the scientific rigor is low, but the practical insights are useful for professionals seeking to streamline questionnaire creation.

167 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which demonstrates creating Google Forms using ChatGPT and Claude via Apps Script.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a practical tutorial by a professional trainer, demonstrating real workflows with Claude and ChatGPT to generate Google Apps Script code for forms. It includes step-by-step instructions and real examples, but lacks external citations and contains promotional content.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video’s original contribution lies in demonstrating a complete workflow to generate a Google Form via AI-generated Apps Script code, rather than merely generating questions. This method saves significant time and minimizes manual effort. It also highlights the use of meeting transcripts as prompts and voice dictation tools for multitasking.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Google Apps Script documentation — Official reference for Apps Script, which is key to automating Google Workspace.
  • Claude by Anthropic — The AI model used in the video to generate the script.
  • ChatGPT — The AI model used in the video for form generation.
  • Google Forms help — Official guide to Google Forms features and usage.

111 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in technical level and quality of information, reflecting the practical and detailed nature of the tutorial. The quantity of information is moderate, as the video focuses on one specific workflow without extensive coverage of alternatives. Reliability is slightly lower due to lack of external citations and promotional elements, but overall the video is useful for its intended purpose.

Reliability 7/10