[CESERH] IMACTIS Research Seminar. Images Today org. by DONDERO & D’ARMENIO (21/9/21) - Seance 2

[CESERH] IMACTIS Research Seminar. Images Today org. by DONDERO & D’ARMENIO (21/9/21) - Seance 2

[CESERH] IMACTIS Research Seminar. Images Today org. by DONDERO & D’ARMENIO (21/9/21) - Session 2

🎙 Anne Beyaert-Geslin 👥 178 📅 November 23, 2021 ⏱ 120 min 👁 54 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-09
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

semioticsalgorithmportraitsingularitygenerality

Summary

This research seminar, organized by Enzo D’Armenio and Maria Giulia Dondero at the University of Liège, presents the second session of the IMACTIS seminar on images, identity, and algorithms. The first speaker, Anne Beyaert-Geslin, proposes a semiotic re-reading of the concept of algorithm, tracing it through the works of Greimas and Courtès. She argues that portraits can be understood as algorithms that strategically organise figurative elements to construct effects of singularity or generality. Comparing contemporary portraits by artists like Giacometti and Laura Henno with Renaissance representations, she distinguishes between categorical individuality (linked to photography) and generic individuality (linked to painting). She also examines the role of the support (photo vs. painting) and the interaction between particular and universal values. The talk weaves together theoretical references (Lévi-Strauss, Todorov, Benveniste) and concrete examples, aiming to reconcile the algorithmic and the singular in visual semiotics.

142 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk offers a valuable and original approach by transposing the algorithmic concept from narrative semiotics to visual genres, particularly the portrait. The argumentation is solid: it carefully defines the algorithm as a strategic rule-based composition, then applies it to a corpus of portraits, showing how the manipulation of figurative traits can produce either singularization or generalization. The speaker supports her claims with multiple theoretical references and concrete examples, demonstrating rigor and depth. The discussion of the photographic versus painted support adds nuance and prevents a simplistic binary view.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presentation is scientifically rigorous: the speaker cites key authors from semiotics (Greimas, Courtès) and art history (Todorov, Didi-Huberman implicitly), and uses examples from well-known artists. The sources are used accurately, and the reasoning is transparent. The title of the video refers to the seminar session, not specifically to the individual talk, but it remains appropriate. The talk itself is well-structured and academically sound. No comments were provided, so no public sentiment analysis is possible.

179 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the seminar session, though it is a title for the whole session rather than the individual talk.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The presentation is given by a recognised scholar in visual semiotics, references key theoretical works (Greimas, Todorov, etc.) and follows a rigorous argumentative structure. The transcript is partial, but the content is coherent and well-supported.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The talk contributes a fresh perspective by applying the semiotic notion of algorithm to the genre of visual portraiture, showing that portraits are not just static representations but dynamic processes that program figurative elements to produce meaning. It bridges narrative semiotics and visual studies, and proposes a detailed typology of individuality (categorical vs generic) based on the support medium.

Pour aller plus loin :

114 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across all dimensions, with slightly lower scores in quantity due to the partial transcript. The talk is technically dense, well-sourced, and thematically focused, indicating a high-quality academic presentation.

Reliability 8/10