[CESERH] IMACTIS Research Seminar. Images Today org. by DONDERO & D’ARMENIO (14/12/21) - Seance 4

[CESERH] IMACTIS Research Seminar. Images Today org. by DONDERO & D’ARMENIO (14/12/21) - Seance 4

🎙 Guillaume Soulez 👥 178 📅 December 15, 2021 ⏱ 140 min 👁 45 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-09
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

image-actdeliberationinteractivityvisual semioticsusage

Summary

This research seminar explores the concept of the ‘image-act’ and its relation to deliberation in interactive media. Guillaume Soulez proposes a theoretical model based on pragmatic and semiotic approaches, arguing that users do not merely interact with images but deliberate upon them, hesitating and weighing clicks. He distinguishes between different levels of deliberation: thematic, formal, and existential, and discusses how these levels intersect. The presentation draws on historical examples such as optical boxes and early film devices to show that image manipulation has a long genealogy. It also examines contemporary interactive works and uses the case of the restitution of Maori heads to illustrate the multiple uses of images and the logic of usage. The talk emphasizes that users construct meaning through various practices, and that the analyst’s role is to retrieve and describe these formative processes. The framework is an original contribution to visual semiotics and media theory, suggesting that a deliberation model can enrich our understanding of interactive media and reception.

163 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in the originality of the theoretical synthesis: Soulez combines pragmatic speech-act theory, semiotics, and an ethnography of usage to propose a nuanced model of ‘délibération des images’. The argumentation is solid in its internal coherence, as he clearly distinguishes levels of deliberation and provides illustrative examples from diverse domains (cinema, interactive media, anthropological rituals). The reasoning is transparent and well-structured, moving from abstract concepts to concrete cases. However, the argument relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and lacks systematic empirical validation, which limits the generalizability of the claims. The speaker acknowledges limitations and leaves some dimensions (e.g., ideological, phenomenological) for future work, which shows intellectual honesty. Overall, the argumentation is persuasive within its theoretical scope but would benefit from more empirical grounding.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is evident in the explicit references to authors such as Benveniste, Carlo Severi, and Jacques Thériault, and in the careful conceptual distinctions. The quality of the sources is high: they are established researchers in semiotics, pragmatics, and anthropology. However, the talk does not provide a systematic literature review or data, and the sources are invoked selectively to support the argument rather than critically discussed. The title and content are well-matched: the seminar is indeed about contemporary images, and the session focuses on the intersection of interactivity and deliberation. The absence of audio-visual aids in the transcript and the dense theoretical nature mean that a non-specialist might struggle, but the content is coherent and relevant. No major shortcomings were detected in the title-content alignment.

268 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately presents the seminar as a research session on contemporary images, and the content aligns with the announced theme of 'Images Today'.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk offers a rigorous theoretical reflection grounded in established semiotic and pragmatic traditions, but the claims remain exploratory and rely on anecdotal examples rather than systematic empirical evidence.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Carlo Severi - Le Principe de la chimère — Referenced in relation to ritual and demonstrative field of images.
  • Jacques Thériault - Ethnographie des usages — Mentioned for the logic of usage as opposed to user manual.
  • Définition de l'image-acte selon Barbosa et Gilbert — Foundation for the concept of image-act.

Contribution & Novelties

This presentation offers an original theoretical framework that bridges interactive media studies with a pragmatic and semiotic analysis of deliberation. The key novelty is the proposal of a ‘deliberation of images’ model, which considers that users engage in reflective choices when interacting with images, and that these choices can be classified into distinct levels. This moves beyond simplistic interactivity paradigms and enriches the analysis of audiovisual reception. The integration of an ethnography of usage, inspired by Jacques Thériault, provides a nuanced view of how users appropriate and even subvert interfaces. The talk also historicizes interactive practices, showing that manipulating images predates digital media.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Semiotics — Foundational concepts for understanding visual and audiovisual signification.
  • Interactivity — The complexity of interactive systems and user engagement.
  • Reception theory — Complementary approaches to audience interpretation.
  • Pragmatics — The study of language in context, applied here to image action.

149 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, but slightly lower in reliability, reflecting a theoretically rich yet exploratory talk. The technical level and reliability scores are similar, indicating a dense, specialized presentation that is not yet empirically validated.

Reliability 7/10