Massimo Leone (Un. Turin) - Semiotic Ideologies. Patterns of Meaning-Making in Language and Society

Massimo Leone (Un. Turin) - Semiotic Ideologies. Patterns of Meaning-Making in Language and Society

🎙 Massimo Leone (presented by Centre de Sémiotique & Rhétorique - ULiège) 👥 177 📅 March 17, 2025 ⏱ 143 min 👁 189 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-09
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

semiotic ideologylinguistic anthropologymeaning-makingfractal cultureSilverstein

Summary

This video is a recording of a book presentation held at the University of Liège on March 12, 2025, for Massimo Leone’s ‘Semiotic Ideologies: Patterns of Meaning-Making in Language and Society’ (Brill, 2024). The event begins with an introduction by the host, Maria Giulia, who outlines Leone’s career and the discussants’ backgrounds. Leone then responds to an opening question about singularity and fractal organization in semiotics, discussing change, regularity, and the role of error in repetition. Costas Nakassis, a linguistic anthropologist, offers extensive comments, framing the book as a crossroads of semiotic traditions and tracing the genealogy of the concept of ideology from Destutt de Tracy through Napoleon, Marx, and Silverstein. The discussion is highly theoretical, engaging with Peirce, Lotman, Bakhtin, and others. The transcript is truncated, cutting off mid-sentence during Nakassis’s remarks. The presentation is aimed at an academic audience familiar with semiotic theory.

145 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video offers substantial value for scholars interested in semiotics, linguistic anthropology, and the history of the concept of ideology. Leone’s opening response articulates a nuanced view of cultural change, positing regularity and irregularity as co-constitutive, and linking error in repetition to biological and cultural evolution. His argument is sophisticated, drawing on his work on religious conversion and the semiotics of the face. Nakassis’s commentary is equally rich, providing a detailed genealogy of ‘ideology’ from its coinage by Destutt de Tracy to its reappropriation in linguistic anthropology via Silverstein. He argues that Leone’s book functions as an infrastructure connecting disparate semiotic traditions, and he praises its synthetic ambition. The argumentation is rigorous, but the transcript’s truncation limits the full assessment of the discussants’ contributions. The discussion remains largely at the level of theoretical exposition rather than empirical demonstration.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presentation demonstrates high scientific rigor, with Leone and Nakassis engaging deeply with foundational texts and concepts. Sources are cited verbally (Peirce, Lotman, Bakhtin, Silverstein, etc.), but no formal bibliography or URLs are provided in the transcript. The title accurately reflects the content, as the discussion centers on the book’s thesis about semiotic ideologies. No comments were provided for analysis, so no trends can be reported.

219 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a book presentation on semiotic ideologies and patterns of meaning-making, with the author and discussants engaging directly with the book's themes.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The presentation is delivered by a recognized full professor of philosophy of communication and semiotics, with discussants from established institutions (University of Luxembourg, University of Chicago, ULiège). The content is grounded in a published book (Brill, 2024) and engages seriously with theoretical traditions. However, the transcript is truncated, and no external sources or empirical data are cited in the available text. The discussion remains largely theoretical and self-referential to the book's arguments.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The book ‘Semiotic Ideologies’ is presented as a major synthetic work that bridges European semiotics (Greimas, Eco, Lotman) and American linguistic anthropology (Silverstein, Peirce). It introduces the concept of semiotic ideology to a broader European audience and applies it to a wide range of phenomena, from religious painting to selfies. The discussion highlights the originality of Leone’s fractal model of culture and his integration of diverse theoretical traditions.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Semiotic Ideology — Wikipedia entry on the concept, providing background and references.
  • Michael Silverstein — Wikipedia page on the linguist who introduced the term ’language ideology’.
  • Linguistic Anthropology — Overview of the field that informs the book’s approach.

111 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high technical level and quality of information, reflecting the academic depth of the discussion. Quantity of information is moderate due to the truncated transcript, while overall reliability is solid given the expertise of the participants. The profile indicates a specialized, theory-heavy presentation.

Reliability 7/10