[CESERH] Conférence de Thomas Broden (Purdue University) à l’ULIège, 15/06/2022

[CESERH] Conférence de Thomas Broden (Purdue University) à l’ULIège, 15/06/2022

[CESERH] Conference by Thomas Broden (Purdue University) at ULiège, 15/06/2022

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Literature & Writing DSLiterature: history and criticism
🎙 Thomas Broden 👥 178 📅 June 25, 2022 ⏱ 118 min 👁 100 📄 original study 🧭 2026-10-09
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

lexicologysemiologystructural linguisticsintellectual historycollocation

Summary

This lecture by Thomas Broden, a professor at Purdue University, examines the shared intellectual path of Algirdas J. Greimas and Roland Barthes from lexicology to semiology during the period 1946-1958. Broden argues that contrary to common characterizations of Barthes as a literary essayist and Greimas as a rigorous linguist, the two men collaborated closely and shared similar epistemological and political commitments. Drawing on archival documents, including letters and grant applications, the lecture traces Barthes’ early interest in lexicology, his project on the vocabulary of political economy under the direction of Ferdinand Brunot, and the methodological innovations he explored, such as collocation analysis and statistical methods. Broden highlights the influence of the Alexandrian circle and figures like Charles Singevin, and shows how Barthes eventually abandoned his lexicological thesis due to theoretical and practical difficulties. The lecture also details how Greimas’ contributions, such as the concept of valence, prefigured later structural semantics. Ultimately, the talk corrects misconceptions and illustrates how the early collaborative work of these two scholars shaped the development of structural linguistics and semiotics.

174 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of this lecture lies in its use of previously under-explored archival materials, such as Barthes’ grant applications and correspondence with Greimas, to reconstruct the intellectual evolution of both thinkers. It offers a nuanced view of their relationship, challenging the binary opposition of the intuitive literary critic versus the systematic linguist. The argumentation is solid: Broden supports each claim with specific documents, quotes, and chronological details, building a persuasive case for a shared methodological project. He also critically assesses limitations, such as Barthes’ admitted lack of training in mathematical and statistical techniques, which strengthens the credibility of the analysis. The lecture demonstrates a rigorous historical methodology, comparing primary sources and contextualizing them within the broader intellectual milieu of French linguistics in the 1950s.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high, as the lecture is based on primary sources including archival documents, letters, and doctoral theses. Broden cites specific items like Barthes’ ‘Le Degré zéro de l’écriture’ and Greimas’ doctoral work, and he carefully cross-references multiple sources to support his narrative. The quality of sources is excellent, with direct references to the Fonds Barthes at the Bibliothèque nationale and Archives nationales. The title is perfectly adequate: it precisely reflects the lecture’s focus on the lexicology-to-semiology transition and the common trajectory of Greimas and Barthes during the specified period. The presentation is rigorous, with clear chronological structuring and explicit citations, though it assumes a high level of familiarity with French linguistic history.

254 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, as the lecture explores the shared intellectual trajectory of Greimas and Barthes from lexicology to semiotics between 1946 and 1958.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The lecture is based on primary sources (archives, letters) and presents a detailed historical analysis of two major figures in linguistics. The speaker is a recognized scholar, and the content is well-documented and critical.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Le Degré zéro de l'écriture — Mentioned as Barthes' first book, drawing on his lexicological research and published in 1953.
  • Sémantique structurale — Referenced as Greimas' later work that developed structural semantics.
  • Essai de grammaire de la langue française — Cited as a source for the concept of 'valence' in relation to collocations.
  • Le Français fondamental — Mentioned as the project in which Barthes participated through Pierre Guiraud.
  • La mode en 1830 — Greimas' thesis, contrasted with Barthes' project and its focus on vocabulary.

Concurring Sources

  • Sémantique structurale — Mentioned as a later work of Greimas that directly builds on the ideas discussed in the lecture.

Contribution & Novelties

This lecture contributes original insights by bringing to light archival documents that reveal the close intellectual collaboration between Greimas and Barthes, challenging the common view of them as divergent thinkers. It shows how their early lexicological work led directly to structural semantics, and it corrects misconceptions about Barthes’ independence from Greimas by demonstrating his prior interest in language. The detailed analysis of Barthes’ abandoned thesis provides a deeper understanding of his intellectual development.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Algirdas Julien Greimas — Overview of Greimas’ life and major contributions to semiotics.
  • Roland Barthes — Comprehensive entry on Barthes’ life, works, and influence.
  • Semiotics — The discipline that emerged from the works of Greimas and Barthes, including key concepts.
  • Lexicology — The study of words and the field central to the lecture’s early focus.
  • Structuralism — The intellectual movement that underpinned their later theoretical frameworks.

144 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a well-rounded and high-performing presentation, with outstanding scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting a dense and rigorous academic lecture. The technical level is very high, suitable for specialists, and the reliability is solid given the use of primary archival sources. This indicates a lecture that excels in all criteria, though its accessibility to a general audience may be limited.

Reliability 8/10